Monday, November 30, 2015

Retail stocks are getting slammed (UA, URBN, M, KSS, GAP, WMT, TGT)

black friday fight shopping

Retail stocks are getting slammed on the Monday after the big Thanksgiving shopping weekend. 

It’s still too soon to definitively tell exactly how Black Friday shopping went, and how Cyber Monday is going.

However, early surveys indicate that it may not have been a spectacular weekend.

Here were some of the biggest losers in retail in early afternoon trading:

  • Urban Outfitters: -4%
  • Under Armour: -3.7%
  • Macy’s: -2%
  • Kohl’s: -2%
  • Gap: -1.8%
  • Walmart: -1.2%
  • Target: -1.2%

The National Retail Federation said more shoppers spent time online instead of in queues outside malls. As for the total volume of sales, it estimated that sales would increase 3.7% this year, although this isn’t comparable to last year, according to USA Today

Preliminary data from analytics firm RetailNext showed that overall sales fell 1.5% on Black Friday, while average shopper spending dropped 1.4%. ShopperTrak estimated a decrease from last year to a total of $12.1 billion.

Retailers started offering discounts long before Black Friday and Cyber Monday, and so that also likely impacted the volume of sales this weekend, and today.

In a note to clients on Monday, Deutsche Bank research analysts wrote,

“We believe Black Friday weekend was soft overall as shoppers stuck to their lists (smaller baskets YOY), partly offset by further migration of traffic to online and before the weekend. We think off-price outperformed on apparel despite deep dept. store discounts, and we saw a modest shift in traffic away from big box retailers as the weekend progressed.”

Also, we’re just coming out of a disastrous third quarter earnings season for most of the major department stores, who blamed declining sales on everything from bad weather to the strong dollar.

SEE ALSO: Everything happening in retail right now in one simple chart

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 5 Ways Retailers Trick You Into Spending More Money

rc.img

rc.img

rc.img

a2.imga2t.imgmf.gif

businessinsider?d=yIl2AUoC8zA businessinsider?i=kn7VlV5IpJU:6zNyHaVzLb businessinsider?i=kn7VlV5IpJU:6zNyHaVzLb businessinsider?d=qj6IDK7rITs businessinsider?i=kn7VlV5IpJU:6zNyHaVzLb




from WordPress http://ift.tt/1XCIJbh

It’s unfortunate what happens to ETFs right after you’re able to invest in them

People love exchange-traded funds, commonly known as ETFs. 

There are thousands of ETFs available for investors to put their money in and collectively these products have trillions in assets under management. 

And the popularity of ETFs has exploded, as seen in this chart from Research Affiliates.

Screen Shot 2015 11 30 at 9.21.06 AM

In the same report, Research Affiliates has some bad news for the investors that account for money pouring into new ETFs: these funds actually don’t do well. 

Research Affiliates looked at the performance of ETF strategies in the three years before coming to market and the three years after coming to market and found that basically, new ETFs are often comprised of strategies that have outperformed peer strategies in recent years only to revert to in-line performance in the coming years. 

Or as Josh Brown might say, new ETFs have done really well for Hindsight Capital Partners LP, but terribly for actual investors. 

Screen Shot 2015 11 30 at 9.20.52 AM

Now, this lackluster performance from new ETFs doesn’t mean that buying the S&P 500 through Vanguard’s fund that charges just $5 per year on each $10,000 invested isn’t a great way to invest in the US’ benchmark stock index. 

A core appeal of ETFs is that they are often inexpensive.

ETFs are also easily bought and sold on the open market, usually have no minimum investment (which many mutual funds have), and can give investors exposure to all kinds of very specific things that mutual funds don’t (like, for example, currency-hedged exposure to Japanese equities). 

On the one hand, getting exposure to Japanese stocks excluding currency risks seems like a great idea in practice, but as Catherine LeGraw at GMO wrote earlier this year, currency hedging is kind of dumb because you’re not really “hedging” your bet but instead adding an additional bet to your existing bet (which in the case of a currency-hedged Japanese stock ETF means that in addition to going long Japanese stocks you’re also also going long yen volatility against the dollar). 

On the other hand, getting exposure to a very specific strategy using a cheap, liquid security allows investors to exhibit their worst behavior. Namely: buying high. 

This year, for example, most of the S&P 500’s gains have come from just a handful of stocks. 

So if you look back at 2015, you might be inclined to say, “Investors that owned Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, and Google, had a great year.” Alternatively, you could say that most investors did much worse, considering the median S&P 500 stock is down about 12% from its 52-week high while the broad index is off just 2% from this level. 

A great idea for 2016 could be an ETF that contains just the four stocks that drove the benchmark stock index’s gains in 2015. But if Research Affiliates’ data says anything conclusive about the future, it’s that more likely than not this won’t be as successful strategy going forward. 

Now aside from this research, ETFs have also been the subject of much hand-wringing in the financial community over the last several years. 

Vanguard founder Jack Bogle, for example, hates them because although his company is a leading provider of these products, he thinks the main beneficiaries are brokers and dealers, not investors. 

Others are worried that ETFs no longer represent the real value of the assets they’re supposed to be tracking and, as a result, could be setting up markets for a major dislocation as investors look to sell what are effectively derivative claims on a basket of assets that have since gone stale. 

But apart from these existential questions about the utility of ETFs, it seems that the “before and after” performance of many ETFs makes at least one part of Bogle’s concern about ETFs hold up quite well: they are one of the great marketing innovations of this century. 

(h/t Robin Wigglesworth)

SEE ALSO: Everything happening in retail in one simple chart

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This massive American aircraft carrier is headed to the Persian Gulf to help fight ISIS

rc.img

rc.img

rc.img

a2.imga2t.imgmf.gif

businessinsider?d=yIl2AUoC8zA businessinsider?i=azK-197nd08:qGvcRTkIbn businessinsider?i=azK-197nd08:qGvcRTkIbn businessinsider?d=qj6IDK7rITs businessinsider?i=azK-197nd08:qGvcRTkIbn




from WordPress http://ift.tt/1ju6QLu

Some bankers aren’t worried about China — they’re excited about the ‘new economy’

China luxury dancers

The Chinese economy is either reaping the whirlwind and falling into a deep slump, or continuing a 35-year megaboom — depending on who you ask.

The collapse of the country’s stock market this year has reinforced the pessimistic view of China’s growth model, but not everyone is bearish. 

Analysts at Morgan Stanley are pretty positive about the country’s “new economy,” according to a note sent out over the weekend. In short, services and consumer growth are still going to power ahead, even as heavy industry and manufacturing slump.

It’s a similar case to the one made by Min-Lan Tan, regional head of UBS Wealth Management’s chief investment office in Asia-Pacific, at a roundtable event in London earlier in November.

She argued that China had a “2-speed economy,” and that rapid advances in emerging services sectors could pick up the slack to sustain roughly 6.5% growth for the next 5 years. The basic message was that there are still major opportunities for investors, and the reality is a long way from the gloom and doom that they might think.

To show the performance of the “new economy,” Morgan Stanley’s researchers take the consumer discretionary, healthcare and IT firms from the MSCI China index of stocks, and compare it to the companies from the same index in the energy, materials and industrial sector:

new economy china

The result is pretty stark. New China has generally outperformed the old since the financial crisis, but particularly since the end of 2012.

The authors provided some of the most recent financial data for the firms in the “new” and “old” economies, showing just how enormous the division is. One appears to be an economy pretty much in recession, while the other is undergoing what can only be described as a boom: 

Within MSCI China, in 3Q15, revenues for Consumer Discretionary, Healthcare and IT grew yoy by 22%, 15% and 20%, respectively. Net profit grew by 39%, 23% and 35%. In comparison, Energy, Industrials and Materials’ 3Q revenues declined by 32%, 1% and 16%, respectively. Net profit declined by 79% for Energy, 32% for Industrials and 67% for Materials.

It all comes down to a question of whether you believe that this new economy can genuinely make up for the slump in the old economy. China’s growth story is, in terms of its scale and speed, probably the most impressive episode of economic development in human history. Can it really double down on that and move so quickly from its industrial revolution to a modern, services-driven economy?

China electricity production

Michael Pettis is one of the sharpest minds in the world looking at the Chinese economy, and he has a better claim to seeing the Chinese slowdown coming than most. He’s mostly concerned with the shape of China’s balance sheets, arguing that the way the country’s expansion was fuelled makes a further slowdown inevitable, and that its current levels of GDP are impossible to keep up.

This quote from a late 2014 blogpost sums up Pettis’ relative scepticism:

I have studied most of the major growth miracles of the past 100 years (and directly experienced some), and in every case there have been pessimists that predicted a difficult adjustment process with much slower growth. In every such case, however, these pessimistic predictions were met with general incredulity (and for some odd reason almost always written off as “wishful thinking”) but while I have indeed found that the pessimists have always been wrong, it always turned out that they were wrong because actual growth turned out to be much worse than they predicted.

This isn’t actually too far from Min-Lan Tan’s view — although she thinks China’s current growth rates will be kept up in the near future, she also agreed that the current rates of growth in China are unsustainable over the long term. 

What’s going on in the Chinese economy right now is so hard to measure and understand that there’s huge disagreement over what’s happening in the economy right now, let alone what’s going to happen next.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: JAMES ALTUCHER: This is why owning a home is financial suicide

rc.img

rc.img

rc.img

a2.imga2t.imgmf.gif

businessinsider?d=yIl2AUoC8zA businessinsider?i=QLNrIyxC-R0:ERjZD6fxQz businessinsider?i=QLNrIyxC-R0:ERjZD6fxQz businessinsider?d=qj6IDK7rITs businessinsider?i=QLNrIyxC-R0:ERjZD6fxQz




from WordPress http://ift.tt/1OzWoNM

US stocks are little changed in early trading after holiday

FILE - This July 15, 2013, file photo, shows a sign for Wall Street outside the New York Stock Exchange, in New York. Global stock markets were mostly lower Monday, Nov. 30, 2015, as investors looked ahead to this week's public appearances by the U.S. Federal Reserve chief for signs of whether the central bank will raise interest rates in December. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File)

NEW YORK (AP) — Stocks were marginally lower in early trading Monday as traders returned from the Thanksgiving holiday. Investors are focused on the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve, as well as preliminary data out of Black Friday and the holiday shopping season.

KEEPING SCORE: The Dow Jones industrial average lost 26 points, or 0.1 percent, to 17,772 as of 10:21 a.m. Eastern. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index lost three points, or 0.1 percent, to 2,087 and the Nasdaq composite edged down two points, or 0.05 percent, to 5,124.

INTEREST RATES: The European Central Bank is widely expected to give the region’s economy another dose of stimulus as it tries to keep a recovery going and get inflation closer to 2 percent. The stimulus is likely to include increasing the amount banks have to pay to park money at the ECB, giving them an incentive to lend it out instead.

IN CONTRAST: While the ECB moves toward increasing stimulus, the Federal Reserve is getting ready to start raising interest rates for the first time since June 2006. A series of U.S. economic reports this week, culminating with Friday’s jobs survey for November, could cement investors’ expectations for a rate hike at its meeting in mid-December.

CURRENCY IMPACT: The expected policy divergence between the two central banks has weighed on the euro and sent the dollar higher. On Monday the euro fell to $1.0578, its lowest level since April. It traded at $1.0591 late Friday.

BARGAINS! BASEMENT PRICES! Retail stocks fell after initial data from Black Friday and the first holiday shopping weekend showed shoppers were not going to stores as much as last year. Preliminary ShopperTrak data showed in-store sales on Thanksgiving and Black Friday were $12.1 billion, down from $12.3 billion in 2014. Analysts said they observed the department stores having to do deep discounting to attract shoppers to their stores.

“We believe Black Friday has gone from a period of management excitement to one of anguish,” Nomura retail analysts Simeon Siegel, Gene Vladimirov and Julie Kim wrote in a note to investors.

Consumer discretionary stocks were down 0.6 percent, compared to the 0.1 percent drop in the S&P 500.

ENERGY: Benchmark U.S. crude rose 70 cents to $42.41 a barrel in New York. Brent crude, which is used to price international oils, was up 64 cents at $45.50 per barrel in London.

BONDS, CURRENCIES: U.S. government bond prices didn’t move much. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note edged down to 2.21 percent from 2.22 percent late Friday. The dollar rose to 123.09 yen from 122.85 yen late Friday.

Join the conversation about this story »

rc.img

rc.img

rc.img

a2.imga2t.imgmf.gif

businessinsider?d=yIl2AUoC8zA businessinsider?i=bld8-pbLmlo:KR25o8aIm8 businessinsider?i=bld8-pbLmlo:KR25o8aIm8 businessinsider?d=qj6IDK7rITs businessinsider?i=bld8-pbLmlo:KR25o8aIm8




from WordPress http://ift.tt/1lUwlrs